/graph/ontologies/inceptiondate.1
https://spec.edmcouncil.org/fibo/ontology/SEC/Funds/CollectiveInvestmentVehicles/inceptionDate.1
W3C Linked Data triplet graph model representation for this definition.
| Subject | Predicate | Object |
|---|---|---|
| <https://spec.edmcouncil.org/fibo/ontology/SEC/Funds/CollectiveInvestmentVehicles/inceptionDate.1> | rdf:type | owl:ObjectProperty |
| <https://spec.edmcouncil.org/fibo/ontology/SEC/Funds/CollectiveInvestmentVehicles/inceptionDate.1> | rdfs:label | "inception date"@en |
| <https://spec.edmcouncil.org/fibo/ontology/SEC/Funds/CollectiveInvestmentVehicles/inceptionDate.1> | rdfs:comment | "Authorization date in the country of origin. Further Notes See definition in Inception Date for Fund. Separate fact exists here. Same definition used. EFAMA Review notes: Inception Date exists as soon as there is a prospectus, so it is a fact about a Share Class even if the share class is never formally issued or offered to the public. Legal structure exists even if something is not launched. Editor question: Review stated this was a fact about Share Class; confirm this fact does not apply to Bond and Note units, or was the term Share Class being used to mean all three? Meanwhile I have put the term "Issue Date" as a fact about all Fund Unit, as this is given a sa separate term in the EFAMA DD spreadsheet. MAy come clearer in the next version of that."@en |
| <https://spec.edmcouncil.org/fibo/ontology/SEC/Funds/CollectiveInvestmentVehicles/inceptionDate.1> | rdfs:isDefinedBy | <https://fxyz.network/ontology/> |
Interactive neighborhood topology mapping relationships for this concept in the fxyz knowledge graph.