/governance/dao · decentralized autonomous organization
Holacracy handles operations. The DAO ratifies protocol changes on-chain. Contribution determines governance weight.
A community-led entity with no central authority. Decisions made collectively through contribution-weighted voting. Digital agreements execute approved proposals automatically. No hierarchical management.
Voting rights and proposal power distributed through Florin, Joule, and HoW contributions
Structured process for submitting and evaluating network changes
Collective ownership and management of network resources
Hybrid governance: holacracy for daily operations, DAO for protocol changes. Contribution-weighted voting across all three token types.
| Holacracy | DAO | Integration |
|---|---|---|
| Role-Based Authority | Contribution-Weighted Rights | Roles enhanced with contribution-weighted voting power in a hybrid governance model |
| Tactical Meetings | Proposal Discussions | Regular meetings inform DAO proposals, ensuring alignment between operations and governance |
| Objection Process | Veto Mechanisms | Token holders can object to proposals, similar to holacracy tension processing |
| Circle Evolution | Protocol Upgrades | Organizational changes trigger corresponding protocol and governance updates |
Basic token infrastructure and governance framework
CompleteConnecting holacracy with network-verified governance mechanisms
In ProgressAutomated protocol execution of approved proposals
PlannedMulti-chain governance coordination and execution
ResearchNetwork contributions enable democratic participation in governance decisions
Participate in DAO governance through our dedicated interface
DAO framework and governance process documentation
Hybrid governance in practice. Holacracy for operations, DAO for ratification. Contribution determines influence.